How Osinbajo Goofed on Magu - Yusuf Ali (SAN)
The seeming stalemate between the Presidency and the Senate over the confirmation of Ibrahim Magu as substantive chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is still very much in the news.
While speaking in an exclusive interview with The Sun, a renowned
lawyer, Yusuf Ali (SAN), debunked Vice President Yemi Osinbajo’s
submission, saying that the constitution does not stipulate that the
Nigerian Senate must confirm the appointment of Ibrahim Magu as
substantive chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
(EFCC).
Here are the excerpt...
What is your opinion on the submission of Vice President,
Prof Yemi Osinbajo, saying that the constitution does not say that the
Senate must confirm the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC)?
I want to believe that the vice president was quoted out of
context. The interpretation of our laws and constitution rests with the
courts alone. Section 171 provides that the Senate should confirm some
people that are nominated for offices. But the constitution does not say
it is only those offices mentioned that need confirmation. The EFCC Act
stipulates that the appointment of its Chairman must be confirmed by
the Senate. And until a competent court nullifies that section of the
EFCC Act, that is the law of Nigeria.
So, there is no person; no matter how highly placed, who can
nullify the law except the court. As at today, it is a requirement of
our law that whoever is nominated as the EFCC chairman must be confirmed
by the Senate. And I want to presume that the vice president who took
an oath to uphold the laws and the constitution of Nigeria will not say
something that will amount to a breach of the law.
Since the Senate has rejected Magu as substantive chairman of the
EFCC, I form a very humble view that it is illegal for him to continue
to act. If he has not been nominated at all, it is no problem. But
having been nominated and rejected, that is the end of his acting
because by the same logic, if the president nominates somebody for
ministerial appointment, and the senate rejects the nomination, the
president cannot appoint the person as acting minister. So, if the
president cannot do that, he cannot continue to use somebody who has
been rejected by the Senate in acting capacity.
Don’t you also agree with his submission that the constitution supersedes the EFCC Act?
The constitution supersedes only when the court declares it null
and void. No individual in this country can sit in his office and
declare the Act null and void.
POSTED BY:OPUOMONI PRIYE
DATE:04/23/2017
0 comments: